The South China Sea and international security (China Daily)

A missile is fired during a Chinese navy drill in South China Sea, July 28, 2015. The ongoing drill is part of the annual exercises, Chinese navy spokespersonLiang Yang said on Saturday, playing down “excessive interpretations.” Liang said that such a drill is in line with international laws and practices, and the navy will continue to hold similar drills in the future. [Photo/CFP]

China’s military exercises in the South China Sea have caused international media to explode with fear mongering. There is a need to look at the South China Sea from an objective perspective and discuss the increasing role of other powers in the region to draw some plausible conclusions.

Boundary disputes are common in international relations. 80% of members of the UN have some dispute of boundaries with their neighbors. It’s an irony that only a few disputes are covered by the media dominated by the West’s strategic communication network, and the South China Sea happens to be one of these.

In the Gulf of Mexico, the United States, Mexico and Cuba have had serious problems in delimiting maritime space between the three nations, especially when it comes to the continental shelf. Spain-Portugal, Ireland-UK, Croatia- Italy- Slovenia, Iran-UAE, Bangladesh-India-Myanmar are just a few examples of maritime disputes affecting international relations and security.

It is also interesting to find that the US always jumps into any dispute (maritime or land), whereever it can draw strategic mileage. Despite being a non-signatory of UNCLOS (United Nations’ Convention on Law of Sea), US Extended Continental Shelf (ECS) claim based on UNCLOS methodology views the entire Pacific Ocean as a US lake.

US global hegemony is the main cause of instability around the whole world, as described by Russian Deputy Defense Minister, Anatoly Antonov,quoted by The diplomat on 1st June 2015, “An epidemic of ‘color revolutions’ swept the Middle East and, like a hurricane, wiped out several states in the region. This disease went across several European countries, where events are freely controlled from the outside”.

The US concept of Asia Pivot revolves around isolating China and creating a block of Regional and Extra Regional 2nd tier powers to strategically suffocate China in the 21st century. These 2nd tier powers include India, Australia and Japan. As reported by The Diplomat (a Japan-based online magazine) on 4th March 2015, Abe and Modi have capitalized on their close personal ties with each other – and the increasingly uncertain external environment created by China’s bellicose foreign policy.In July 2014, Japan participated in the Malabar exercises, traditionally a bilateral India-U.S. exercise, at India’s invitation.

Times of India (31st May 2015), spelled the uneasiness with the Chinese stand, as India seeks to further its economic and defense engagement with Vietnam, China has warned New Delhi that it can’t explore oil and gas blocks in South China Sea without seeking Beijing’s approval. However social media trolls commenting on the Times of India Story indicated the frustration with some recommending that the US should place five Air Craft Carriers in South China Sea to teach China a lesson.

The force posture agreement between US and Australia and the new security deal of placing extra US forces in the region is part of the architecture of false security being conveyed to the Asia Pacific region. Australia is being positioned as the US deputy sherriff.

Limits of 2nd tier powers stem from limited diplomatic, economic and military potential and ability to find their place in a framework of the South China Sea. India’s divided polity, poor relations within SAARC and struggle with abject poverty, Japan’s poor demographic standing and declining economy and Australia’s self-appointed role as the US’ deputy sherriff despite her remoteness and demographic challenges are just a few of the limitations.

Chinese rapprochement with Malaysia and offering of joint mechanism to develop the energy potential of the South China Sea to all stake holders is a good omen, however; China needs a state of the art perception management mechanism to project strategic economic initiatives in a media landscape dominated by CNN and Hollywood.

The China- Russia strategic Colossus to check the West’s hegemony is a positive step, and the decision by both sides to hold a security exercise in 2016 in the South China Sea will give assurance to the entire world that we are now moving from the unilateralism of the US to a multi-polar paradigm which should positively help global peace.

China needs to ask India if she wants to become a vassal state of Non Eurasian powers or be part of the Southern Colossus to rid the world of the hegemony of the West. India may well heed the Portuguese proverb, you cannot want the sun to shine on the threshing floor, while it rains on the turnip field.

Umar Waqar,a freelance journalist in Lahore, also contributed to the story.

(Waqar Khan Kauravi is a Defence Analyst based at Lahore (Pakistan), and can be reached at ).