EC, 'Lawyer Aun' petitions the EC to take down 16 Senators who hold shares in media companies, which is considered unqualified. Evidence shows that they are a limited company that produces media, clearly accepting large-scale event jobs in Yala. He is also preparing to submit evidence to the EC to take down Senators who hold shares in media companies and nominees, believing that they will definitely be acquitted. Mr. Phatthapong Suphaksorn or Lawyer Aun Buriram filed a petition to the Election Commission to investigate the qualifications of a member of the Senate (Senator) Group 16, Arts, Culture, Music, Performance and Entertainment, an athlete with a high score, in the case of holding shares in a media company, which falls under the category of being prohibited from being a Senator or not. Mr. Phattharapong said that the senator was listed in a limited partnership. When he looked at the memorandum of association obtained from the Department of Business Development, it was found that the company was engag ed in advertising media, including distributing films, and was engaged in the business of distributing and producing educational media about various software. He therefore came to ask the EC whether the memorandum of association of the company was a shareholding in any media and mass communication businesses according to the Organic Act on the Acquisition of Senators 2018, Section 14 (3), and whether it violated Section 108 (1) of the Constitution. Mr. Pattarapong added that this senator is a major shareholder in the limited partnership. In addition, in April, he received a procurement job from the government in Yala Province to organize an event with a budget of 2-3 million baht. There was an announcement in the government regulations, which were generally announced for media companies to bid. He wanted to ask if the EC would use the same standards as Mr. Pita Limjaroenrat because the limited partnership of the senator is clearly engaged in media business. He sent a letter to ask the Department of Business Development or sent a letter to ask the province, which is Yala Province. In addition, the EC did not need to call the senator to give a statement because the facts were clear. The EC only had the duty to collect evidence for the investigation and send it to the Constitutional Court for a decision. Mr. Pattarapong added that he is preparing to submit a request to the EC to investigate the qualifications of 4-5 senators related to the big house in Group 16 for holding shares in an illegal manner, such as being nominees, including a senator who used to be a driver for the big house. He will submit a request for investigation after the Constitutional Court makes a ruling in the case of dissolving the Move Forward Party. He is confident that he can take them down. In addition, last week, I gave information to the EC in the petition requesting the examination of the qualifications of Dr. Kesakamol Pliansamai, a senator, which is currently in the process of preparing the documents of the investigator. It is expec ted that within this week, the case will be forwarded to the investigation working group before being forwarded to the political party registrar. I would like to speak without prejudice that Dr. Kesakamol will not survive. Even if the EC does nothing, the senator has the power in ethics, as does the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC). I will wait and see whether the EC will support all 200 people. I expect that the EC will gradually take them down, along with the investigation agencies, such as the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) or the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO), they should not let this matter go. Mr. Phatthapong said that after the Senate has appointed various committees, he will submit a request to the committee related to natural resources and the environment to investigate the Khao Kradong matter to find out who is blue or who is related to the Khao Kradong godfather. We will know this. Source: Thai News Agency

EC, 'Lawyer Aun' petitions the EC to take down 16 Senators who hold shares in media companies, which is considered unqualified. Evidence shows that they are a limited company that produces media, clearly accepting large-scale event jobs in Yala. He is also preparing to submit evidence to the EC to take down Senators who hold shares in media companies and nominees, believing that they will definitely be acquitted. Mr. Phatthapong Suphaksorn or Lawyer Aun Buriram filed a petition to the Election Commission to investigate the qualifications of a member of the Senate (Senator) Group 16, Arts, Culture, Music, Performance and Entertainment, an athlete with a high score, in the case of holding shares in a media company, which falls under the category of being prohibited from being a Senator or not. Mr. Phattharapong said that the senator was listed in a limited partnership. When he looked at the memorandum of association obtained from the Department of Business Development, it was found that the company was engag ed in advertising media, including distributing films, and was engaged in the business of distributing and producing educational media about various software. He therefore came to ask the EC whether the memorandum of association of the company was a shareholding in any media and mass communication businesses according to the Organic Act on the Acquisition of Senators 2018, Section 14 (3), and whether it violated Section 108 (1) of the Constitution. Mr. Pattarapong added that this senator is a major shareholder in the limited partnership. In addition, in April, he received a procurement job from the government in Yala Province to organize an event with a budget of 2-3 million baht. There was an announcement in the government regulations, which were generally announced for media companies to bid. He wanted to ask if the EC would use the same standards as Mr. Pita Limjaroenrat because the limited partnership of the senator is clearly engaged in media business. He sent a letter to ask the Department of Business Development or sent a letter to ask the province, which is Yala Province. In addition, the EC did not need to call the senator to give a statement because the facts were clear. The EC only had the duty to collect evidence for the investigation and send it to the Constitutional Court for a decision. Mr. Pattarapong added that he is preparing to submit a request to the EC to investigate the qualifications of 4-5 senators related to the big house in Group 16 for holding shares in an illegal manner, such as being nominees, including a senator who used to be a driver for the big house. He will submit a request for investigation after the Constitutional Court makes a ruling in the case of dissolving the Move Forward Party. He is confident that he can take them down. In addition, last week, I gave information to the EC in the petition requesting the examination of the qualifications of Dr. Kesakamol Pliansamai, a senator, which is currently in the process of preparing the documents of the investigator. It is expec ted that within this week, the case will be forwarded to the investigation working group before being forwarded to the political party registrar. I would like to speak without prejudice that Dr. Kesakamol will not survive. Even if the EC does nothing, the senator has the power in ethics, as does the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC). I will wait and see whether the EC will support all 200 people. I expect that the EC will gradually take them down, along with the investigation agencies, such as the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) or the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO), they should not let this matter go. Mr. Phatthapong said that after the Senate has appointed various committees, he will submit a request to the committee related to natural resources and the environment to investigate the Khao Kradong matter to find out who is blue or who is related to the Khao Kradong godfather. We will know this. Source: Thai News Agency