"Srisuwan" pleads guilty to "Somsak", pointing out that he was the promoter of the proposal for the Cabinet to postpone the Disappearance Act. ignore social media in front of the computer just a sparrow
Reporters reported that Mr. Srisuwan Janya, secretary-general of the Association for the Protection of the Thai Constitution traveled to submit a petition to the NACC to punish the government General Prayut Chan-o-cha, especially Mr. Somsak Thepsutin, former Minister of Justice. In case of nomination Royal Decree to postpone the use Prevention and Suppression of Torture and Enforced Disappearance Act B.E. Or seriously violated or failed to comply with ethical standards?
Mr. Srisuwan said that as a result of Mr. Somsak Minister of Justice at that time proposed to the government Gen. Prayut issues the royal decree to postpone the use of Act on Prevention of Torture and Disappearance instead using the power according to the 2017 Constitution, Section 172, first paragraph, in issuing the Decree to postpone the enforcement to October 1, 2023, claiming that relevant agencies such as the Royal Thai Police There is still no readiness in purchasing and procuring recording equipment while arresting and detaining on cars and detention cells in police stations. The President of the House of Representatives proposed to the Constitutional Court to rule that Is the exercise of power contrary to Section 172 of the Constitution? In the end, the Constitutional Court ruled 8 to 1 on May 18, 2023 that the said Decree was contrary to that Section of the Constitution, causing Royal Decree has passed and has no effect. Causing the law to be carried away to go back into force on February 22, 2023, as originally required by law.
Mr. Srisuwan said that the government of General Prayut Use your power to delay the enforcement of such torture/disappearance laws. It suggests that the government deliberately violates several provisions of the constitution. Especially Section 53, until the Constitutional Court has ruled that it cannot be done. Such actions may be considered a serious violation of ethics. without the power to do so Causing serious damage to the nation, the country, the rule of law, and the rule of law. Association for the Protection of the Thai Constitution therefore cooperated with his relatives in May 1992 to bring a petition to the NACC to investigate and investigate the government of Gen. Prayut To point out the ethical standards for which the executive authority is responsible. as required by law in order not to be an example of the exercise of power without consideration of the rights and liberties of the people as specified by the Constitution in the future
Mr. Srisuwan also mentioned the case of Mr. Phitha. Lim Chareonrat far-reaching party leader Holding shares of ITV media that anyone who has any duty can do their own duty. The Election Commission has followed the steps. This matter is similar to Mr. Thanathorn's shareholding. Juangroongruangkit Former leader of the Future Forward Party which happened during the confirmation of MPs as well, so it must be said according to the facts People should listen.-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency