“Wisanu” points out that it is not a matter of domination, the coalition parties discussed at Ban Chan Song La.

"Wisanu" sees "Thaksin" not dominating the coalition parties, can consult and discuss at Chan Song La house, holding back whether he will come back to help the new government or not. Mr. Wissanu Krea-ngam, former advisor to the Prime Minister, spoke before the Cabinet meeting about the case of the coalition parties talking to Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra, the former Prime Minister, at the Chan Song La house. Can it be considered that Mr. Thaksin influences or not? It is considered a meeting and a discussion. It cannot be called influence because there must be consultation and discussion. It may be a meeting somewhere. It is done in a grand manner, not secretive. And the meeting at the Chan Song La house is not strange. The reporter asked that people thought that Thaksin had power over the government. Mr. Wisanu said that he did not know. He was not there. He did not know what they were doing. Personally, he did not think so. For example, if the Prime Minister discussed with him, would he say that he was controlli ng or not? That would not be true because the people who have the power to make decisions make decisions themselves. He did not know what they were doing at the Chan Song La house and did not even know who went. Ask the people who went whether they were controlling anything or not. It is possible that the people who went were the ones who proposed it. In this case, it was a request for advice, consultation, or to discuss whether the strategy would pass or not when submitted to the parliament. It is something that can be discussed and all parties go together. No one can control each other. Who can control Mr. Anutin Charnvirakul, the leader of the Bhumjaithai Party? Who can control Mr. Pirapan Salirathavibhaga, the leader of the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party? -317. Source: Thai News Agency